Use case · Compliance achievement
Run the work, and the audit evidence writes itself.
UNECE R155 type approval, its paired R156 software-update regulation and an ISO/SAE 21434 assessment all ask for the same thing underneath: proof that you monitor, analyse, decide and record, continuously. Correlens is where that work already happens, so the records assessors ask for are a byproduct of doing it, not a separate compliance chore.
Regulatory horizon
The deadlines are not the story. The evidence is.
The regulations are in force and their dates are public. What decides an assessment is whether your day-to-day work leaves the records behind.
Beyond the EU
The same discipline, on every homologation desk.
Cybersecurity management has gone global: the frameworks differ by market, but they all ask for a managed inventory, vulnerability handling and records. Evidence produced once serves all of them.
What maps to what
From clause to module, without a spreadsheet.
What each framework asks for, and where in the platform that work already happens.
The mapping is a navigation aid, not a certification claim: assessments are performed by authorities and audit bodies, and expert consultancy can support you through them.
This is not machine-only compliance. Analysts stay in the loop on every decision, and expert consultancy is available for CSMS build-up, TARA work and assessment preparation.